Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Position paper critiques narratives around AI, examining its role in neurodivergent cognition and potential risks.
This work is an original, human authored manuscript written entirely by the author, Alessandro Grassini Grimaldi. No artificial intelligence systems, generative writing tools, or automated text generation software were used in the drafting, composition, or structuring of this paper. All arguments, formulations, interpretations, and narrative decisions are the result of independent human reasoning, lived experience, and sustained intellectual work by the author. Any use of artificial intelligence discussed within the paper is analytical and conceptual, not instrumental to the paper’s production. The paper is intentionally positioned in critical opposition to dominant contemporary narratives surrounding artificial intelligence. It examines AI not as an authorial agent but as a subject of analysis, specifically as a potential cognitive and institutional force that, if uncritically adopted or improperly regulated, may produce harm rather than liberation. All materials deposited by the author on Zenodo and associated repositories are original works produced by the author. This record is provided to ensure transparency of authorship, protect intellectual provenance, and prevent future misattribution or mischaracterisation of the work. This deposit constitutes a preprint and position paper intended to establish intellectual priority and invite critical engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alessandro Grassini Grimaldi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: