PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026BioScience2 citationsOpen Access

Measuring the Quality of Species List Contents

View Full Paper
TPTh. PapeRPRichard L PyleOBOlaf Bánki

Key Points

  • The main aim is to create reliable indicators to evaluate the quality and completeness of species lists.
  • Developed 24 indicators to assess species lists.
  • Conducted a global survey to gauge taxonomist preferences for weighting indicators.
  • Tested these indicators on 16 species lists across various organisms.
  • Indicators help characterize how well a list covers its intended organisms.
  • Weighted scores reflect taxonomists' preferences.
  • Expectation of further refinement post public debate.

Abstract

Abstract Taxonomic lists, usually of species, have many functions. However, there is currently no reliable and convenient way to determine whether a list contains the information that a user requires other than by reading the list in detail. We therefore developed 24 indicators to characterise list contents. The indicators aim to describe the extent to which the scored list covers their intended class of organisms, the quality of their taxonomic scholarship, and additional information they provide for each taxon. We tested the indicators on 16 lists drawn from a wide range of vertebrates, invertebrates, and plants. A list content score was derived from individual indicator scores after they had been weighted to reflect the preferences that taxonomists had expressed in a global survey. The indicators aim to help list creators provide the details taxonomists and list users consider important. We expect indicators to be refined after public debate..

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pape et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd60c1c9540dea80f25fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biaf191
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper