PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Quantum Annealing based Power Grid Partitioning for Parallel Simulation

View Full Paper
CHCarsten HartmannForschungszentrum JülichJZJunjie ZhangUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaCCCarlos Daniel Gonzalez CazalaForschungszentrum Jülich

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize graph partitioning for parallel simulation in power systems using quantum annealing.
  • Developed a mapping of optimal partitioning requirements to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) formulation.
  • Tested the QUBO formulation on a D-Wave quantum processing unit (QPU).
  • Analyzed the impact of embedding QUBO on D-Wave QPUs and its limitation on problem size.
  • Optimal partitioning was achieved for graphs with under 200 buses.
  • Found that the necessity for embedding affects time-to-solution negatively.
  • Discussed implications of quantum hardware non-ideality on simulation implementation.

Abstract

Graph partitioning has many applications in power systems, from decentralized state estimation to parallel simulation. Focusing on parallel simulation, optimal grid partitioning minimizes the idle time caused by different simulation times for the sub-networks and their components and reduces the overhead required to simulate the cuts. Partitioning a graph into two parts such that, for example, the cut is minimal and the sub-graphs have equal size is an NP-hard problem. In this paper, we show how optimal partitioning of a graph can be obtained using quantum annealing (QA). We show how to map the requirements for optimal splitting to a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) formulation and test the proposed formulation using a current D-Wave QPU. We show that the necessity to find an embedding of the QUBO on current D-Wave QPUs limits the problem size to under 200 buses and notably affects the time-to-solution. We finally discuss the implications of quantum hardware non-ideality on near term implementation in the simulation loop.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hartmann et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd81c1c9540dea80f2dchttps://doi.org/10.34734/fzj-2025-02787
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper