PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Systematic Biology0 citationsOpen Access

The Dayhoff Exchange Score: A new metric to quantify entropic site saturation in amino acid datasets prior to phylogenetic analysis

View Full Paper
JFJames F. FlemingTSTorsten Hugo Struck

Key Points

  • The main aim is to introduce and validate the Dayhoff Exchange Score (DE-score) as a metric for quantifying entropic site saturation in amino acid datasets prior to phylogenetic analysis.
  • Developed the DE-score metric to assess site saturation
  • Evaluated the DE-score on over 20,000 simulation datasets
  • Compared the DE-score to the existing Slope R2 score
  • Investigated confounding factors like taxon number and missing data
  • Re-evaluated previous datasets using the DE-score
  • The DE-score effectively detected increased entropic site saturation across simulation datasets
  • It provided a clearer overview of dataset and taxon-specific contributions to saturation
  • DE-score outperformed the Slope R2 score, indicating improved accuracy in phylogenetic analysis

Abstract

Abstract Entropic site saturation is a persistent problem in phylogenetic analyses, where it can hinder the accuracy of topology reconstruction. It is fundamentally caused by large amounts of independent change along branches, causing the model to be unable to distinguish phylogenetic signal from noise. The Dayhoff Exchange Score (DE-score) is a new metric to assess this form of site saturation within and between amino acid datasets, which provides both a whole dataset overview and taxon-specific values that represent the contribution of a given taxon to the whole dataset entropic site saturation. We first assess the efficacy of this score at detecting increased entropic site saturation on over 20,000 simulation datasets, compare it to the existing Slope R2 score and then assess its efficacy in the face of the potentially confounding factors of increasing taxon number, number of positions in the alignment, missing data and noise. Finally, we use the DE-Score to re-evaluate several previously published datasets, to illustrate its efficacy. The DE-Score is available at: https://github.com/JFFleming/DEScore

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Fleming et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fdc7c1c9540dea80f898https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syag009
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The opsins.2005 · 658 citations
  2. 2Identifying and addressing methodological incongruence in phylogenomics: A review2023 · 38 citations
  3. 3Phylogenomic Subsampling and the Search for Phylogenetically Reliable Loci2021 · 136 citations
  4. 4Resolving tricky nodes in the tree of life through amino acid recoding2022 · 37 citations
  5. 5nRCFV: a new, dataset-size-independent metric to quantify compositional heterogeneity in nucleotide and amino acid datasets2023 · 23 citations