Meta-analysis evaluates homocysteine-lowering therapy effects on kidney outcomes in chronic kidney disease, suggesting limited clinical significance.
Hyperhomocysteinemia is common in chronic kidney disease; however, whether homocysteine-lowering therapy slows chronic kidney disease progression remains uncertain. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline, we systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science (inception to January 2025) for randomized controlled trials evaluating folic acid alone or combined with vitamin B versus placebo/usual care/low-dose regimens in populations across the chronic kidney disease spectrum. The primary end point was composite kidney outcomes (all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, and kidney disease progression). Relative risks with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using fixed- or random-effect models according to heterogeneity. Nine trials comprising 23,638 participants met inclusion criteria. Overall heterogeneity for the primary outcome was low (I²=27%), and homocysteine-lowering therapy was associated with a marginal reduction in composite kidney outcomes (relative risk=0.96 and 95% confidence interval=0.92–1.00; p = 0.04). Subgroup analyses suggested a greater benefit in participants with normal to moderate chronic kidney disease (relative risk=0.89 and 95% confidence interval=0.81–0.97; p=0.008) and in non-White populations (relative risk=0.89 and 95% confidence interval=0.81–0.97; p=0.008). No significant effects were observed for cardiovascular events (relative risk=0.94 and 95% confidence interval=0.84–1.06) or all-cause mortality (relative risk=0.99 and 95% confidence interval 0.87–1.11). In conclusion, homocysteine-lowering therapy yields, at most, a small reduction in composite kidney outcomes with limited clinical significance and provides no detectable benefits for cardiovascular events or mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: