Higher postoperative mean transmitral gradient after pediatric mitral valve repair was associated with an increased risk of reintervention (HR 1.26 per 1 mmHg; 95% CI 1.16-1.38; p<0.001).
Cohort (n=112)
No
Do postoperative mean transmitral gradient and residual mitral regurgitation predict long-term mitral valve reintervention in children undergoing mitral valve repair?
In pediatric mitral valve repair, higher postoperative mean transmitral gradients significantly predict the need for long-term reintervention, whereas moderate-or-greater residual regurgitation does not.
Hazard Ratio: 1.26 (95% CI 1.16–1.38)
p-value: p=<0.001
Abstract OBJECTIVES Mitral valve repair is the preferred surgical approach for paediatric mitral valve disease, but predictors of long-term durability remain poorly defined. We aimed to describe long-term outcomes after mitral valve repair in children and to identify echocardiographic predictors of mitral valve reintervention. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients younger than 18 years who underwent mitral valve repair between 2000 and 2024 at a single tertiary centre. Patients with atrioventricular septal defects or single-ventricle physiology were excluded. Preoperative and predischarge echocardiography assessed mitral regurgitation grade and mean transmitral gradient. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up data were reviewed and analysed. Reintervention was analysed using competing-risk methods including postoperative mean transmitral gradient and residual mitral regurgitation at discharge. RESULTS A total of 112 children were included (age range 5 days–17 years; body weight 2.3–100 kg). Operative mortality was 0.9% (n = 1), late mortality 3.6% (n = 4), and one patient underwent heart transplantation. The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention was 27.5%, 32.9%, 46.6% and 46.6% at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years, respectively. In the Fine and Gray model, higher postoperative mean transmitral gradient was associated with an increased cumulative incidence of reintervention (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.26 per 1 mmHg, 95% confidence interval 1.16–1.38; p 0.001), whereas moderate-or-greater residual mitral regurgitation at discharge was not significantly associated (subdistribution hazard ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.25–1.17; p = 0.12). Death and/or heart transplantation events were rare during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS In this paediatric cohort, mitral valve repair was associated with low operative mortality and satisfactory long-term survival, but reintervention represented the main late risk. Higher postoperative mean transmitral gradient was associated with reduced valve durability, whereas moderate-or-greater residual regurgitation was not independently associated. These findings support efforts to minimise postoperative transmitral gradients when feasible, while individualising the balance between residual stenosis and regurgitation according to valve pathology and repair complexity.
Gianluca et al. (Tue,) conducted a cohort in paediatric mitral valve disease (n=112). Higher postoperative mean transmitral gradient was evaluated on mitral valve reintervention (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.16-1.38, p=<0.001). Higher postoperative mean transmitral gradient after pediatric mitral valve repair was associated with an increased risk of reintervention (HR 1.26 per 1 mmHg; 95% CI 1.16-1.38; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: