PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Zinc Status in Iraq (1990–2026): Prevalence, Trends, and Regional/Global Comparisons

View Full Paper
DADhia J Al-TimimiMHMwafaq Ramzi Haji

Key Points

  • To assess the prevalence of zinc deficiency and serum zinc levels in the Iraqi population over a 36-year period.
  • Conduct a systematic review following PRISMA-P guidelines.
  • Search multiple databases including PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus.
  • Two independent reviewers will screen studies and extract data.
  • Risk of bias will be assessed using standardized tools.
  • Perform a random-effects meta-analysis on Iraqi data.
  • Estimate pooled prevalence of zinc deficiency and mean serum zinc levels in Iraq.
  • Identify trends related to zinc status before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Compare findings with MENA regional and global zinc deficiency data.

Abstract

This protocol outlines the methodology for a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the zinc status of the Iraqi population over a 36-year period (1990–2026). Zinc is an essential micronutrient critical for immune function, growth, and development, with deficiency posing a significant public health burden. Primary Aim: To synthesize existing English-language evidence and estimate the pooled prevalence of zinc deficiency and mean serum/plasma zinc levels across all Iraqi demographic groups, including analysis of trends before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary & Comparative Aim: To contextualize the findings from Iraq by comparing the pooled estimates with published data from the broader Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and global figures. This comparison will help determine if the burden of zinc deficiency in Iraq is disproportionate and identify potential regional or global disparities. Methodology: The review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We will conduct extensive searches across multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, etc.). Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data, and assess the risk of bias using standardized tools (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, Cochrane RoB 2.0, AMSTAR-2). A random-effects meta-analysis will be performed for Iraqi data. Findings will be compared narratively and statistically with existing systematic reviews on MENA and global zinc status. Expected Impact: This work will provide the first consolidated evidence on the magnitude and trends of zinc deficiency in Iraq, inform national nutrition policy and interventions, and offer a comparative perspective to understand Iraq's position within regional and global health contexts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Al-Timimi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe35c1c9540dea8100afhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18433933
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper