This systematic review analyzes demographic biases in language recordings from CHILDES, suggesting careful generalization is needed.
In recent years, the importance of estimating demographic biases in research has become apparent. Here, we provide a systematic review of the CHILDES database, the major source of naturalistic recordings of children's linguistic environment. We analyzed the database according to four dimensions considered central to language learning: SES, urbanization, family structure, and language. We present descriptive statistics of each dimension to assess whether naturalistic recordings were biased regarding the demographics of the countries and the families recorded within them. We find that CHILDES's recordings overrepresented wealthier countries and higher parental education levels, urban settings, and smaller households. Middle‐ and higher‐class participants were likewise over‐represented. The corpora were not representative of their countries in terms of urbanization either—with a larger percentage of families residing in urban settings than is overall true for their respective countries. In terms of family structure, nuclear families were more prevalent than in the countries where the data were collected. Last, we found that corpora were linguistically diverse, but we estimate that these recordings underrepresented bilingual and multilingual households. We conclude that researchers should be mindful when generalizing from naturalistic recordings of children's input and output obtained from CHILDES and make recommendations for the future use of CHILDES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scaff et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: