PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026FACETS0 citationsOpen Access

Native bee genus diversity within bee-friendly urban gardens varies little along an urbanization gradient

View Full Paper
MRMackenzie RepovsALAmanda LicznerJPJason Pither

Key Points

  • The study aims to estimate bee genus abundance, richness, and composition in urban gardens and assess the impact of urbanization and garden attributes.
  • Studied 32 bee-friendly gardens in Kelowna, British Columbia.
  • Conducted over 10 sampling days per garden to observe bee genera.
  • Analyzed relationships between bee diversity and urbanization, garden size, and plant diversity within 300 m of gardens.
  • Identified 19 genera, primarily from the Halictidae family, representing about half of the region's known bee diversity.
  • No significant association between urbanization or garden size and bee genus richness or abundance.
  • A minor percentage of variance in genus composition was linked to the urbanization gradient, accounting for 6.8% when excluding rare genera.

Abstract

Urban bee populations are threatened by ongoing habitat loss and fragmentation. Bee-friendly gardens with abundant forage and nesting resources may help offset these pressures, but attributes of the broader urban landscape could also play an important role. We explored bee diversity within 32 bee-friendly gardens distributed throughout the city of Kelowna, British Columbia. Our objectives were to (i) estimate bee genus abundance, richness, and composition within the gardens, and (ii) investigate how these facets of diversity varied with plant diversity, garden size, and degree of urbanization within 300 m of the garden. In total, over 10 sampling days per garden, we observed 19 genera—about half of those known from the region—primarily within the Halictidae family (66.4% of total abundance). Neither bee genus richness nor total bee abundance was associated with any of the explanatory variables, whereas a minor (though statistically significant) percentage of the among-site variance in genus composition was uniquely accounted for by the urbanization gradient (6.8% with rare genera excluded, 5.8% when included). Our study is the first to evaluate urban bee diversity within the Okanagan diversity hotspot and our findings add to previous studies elsewhere demonstrating inconsistent effects of garden and landscape-scale characteristics on bee diversity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Repovs et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe48c1c9540dea81040chttps://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2025-0094
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Geographic drivers more important than landscape composition in predicting bee beta diversity and community structure2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Nesting habitat of ground‐nesting bees: a review2020 · 294 citations
  3. 3Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis2012 · 166 citations
  4. 4Spatial Data Science2023 · 1,201 citations
  5. 5Supporting Bees in Cities: How Bees Are Influenced by Local and Landscape Features2021 · 182 citations