PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Brain Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Inconsistency in the Association Between Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Dementia Risk: An Updated Meta-Analysis

View Full Paper
TPTzu-Rong PengHLHung-Hong LinLYLi-Jou Yang

Key Points

  • To evaluate the association between proton pump inhibitor use and the risk of developing dementia.
  • Systematic search of databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library.
  • Independent extraction of study data by two investigators.
  • Analysis of observational studies comparing PPI users with non-users.
  • Calculation of pooled risk ratios and confidence intervals using a random-effects model.
  • No significant overall association between PPI use and dementia risk (RR = 1.14).
  • Significant heterogeneity found among studies (I2 = 99%).
  • Increased risk in individuals aged ≥65 years (RR = 1.21).
  • Higher risk noted in studies from Asia (RR = 1.31) and Europe (RR = 1.32).
  • Findings suggest population-specific vulnerability but lack robust overall evidence.

Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to manage acid-related gastrointestinal conditions. Nevertheless, growing attention has been paid to their long-term safety, especially their possible link to dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Prior research has yielded inconsistent findings, underscoring the need for a comprehensive and current evaluation. Methods: A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant publications up to May 28, 2025, without language restrictions. Two investigators independently extracted study information and evaluated methodological quality as well as potential sources of bias. Eligible studies were observational in design and investigated the association between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) exposure and the risk of developing dementia compared with non-use. For the quantitative synthesis, pooled risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding confidence intervals were generated using a random-effects approach. Study Results: Eighteen studies, encompassing more than 6.3 million participants, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled estimate showed no statistically significant association between PPI use and overall dementia risk (RR = 1.14, 95% CI 0.98–1.33; I2 = 99%). However, significant heterogeneity and variable risk of bias—particularly due to confounding, exposure misclassification, and immortal time bias—limit certainty in these findings. Subgroup analyses revealed significantly elevated risks among individuals aged ≥65 years (RR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.01–1.46) and in studies from Asia (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.12–1.52) and Europe (RR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.10–1.59), suggesting possible population- or context-specific vulnerability. Conclusions: Our findings reveal a lack of consistent evidence supporting a link between PPI use and dementia risk, primarily due to significant heterogeneity among existing studies. While no robust overall association was demonstrated, significant subgroup signals in older adults and specific regions suggest that clinical uncertainty remains. Rather than indicating a direct causal risk, these results underscore the importance of prescribing stewardship. Clinicians should focus on appropriate prescribing, ensuring long-term PPI therapy is reserved for patients with a clear therapeutic justification and utilized for the shortest effective duration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe48c1c9540dea81040fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16020159
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper