Simulation evaluates combustion and flow optimization in a coal-fired boiler, suggesting design improvements for emission control.
Growing renewable penetration increases deep peak-shaving demands, making stable wide-load operation of coal-fired boilers essential. A full-process CFD model of a 660 MW ultra-supercritical boiler was established, covering the furnace, heat-transfer surfaces, rear-pass duct, and selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system. Simulations at 25–100% boiler maximum continuous rating (BMCR) quantified load effects on combustion and emissions. Predicted furnace outlet temperature and major flue-gas species matched field data with deviations within ±6%. Lowering the load from 100% to 25% BMCR contracted the high-temperature core in the furnace and reduced mean temperature and mixing. Furnace nitrogen oxides (NOx) formation decreased as the load decreased. However, NOx at 25% BMCR increased because separated over-fire air (SOFA) was not applied. Reduced combustion intensity increased the level of unburned carbon in fly ash, which rose by approximately 3.5% at 25% BMCR, relative to the rated condition. Pronounced flow maldistribution also appeared at 25% BMCR. The SCR-inlet flow analysis indicated that the original guide vane design was not suitable for wide-load operation and that inlet-velocity uniformity deteriorated, especially at low loads. An optimized guide vane scheme is proposed, improving SCR-inlet uniformity over the full load range while mitigating ash deposition and erosion risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: