PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Estimation of enteric methane emissions in dairy cows under grazing a silvopastoral system and a grass monoculture in the Colombian Amazonian foothills

View Full Paper
JNJuan Pablo Narváez-HerreraJAJoaquín Angulo ArizalaWBWilson Andrés Barragán-Hernández

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess enteric methane emissions from dairy cows in silvopastoral and monoculture grazing systems using a laser methane detector.
  • Compared methane emissions from silvopastoral system and grass monoculture with a crossover design.
  • Utilized a laser methane detector for non-invasive emission measurements during various activities.
  • Conducted the study in the humid tropics over four periods with two groups of cows.
  • Daily methane emissions were significantly lower in the silvopastoral system compared to grass monoculture (233 g vs. 277 g CH₄ animal ⁻ ¹ day ⁻ ¹).
  • Methane intensity was reduced in the silvopastoral system across various metrics: 15.5 vs. 20.7 g CH₄ kg milk ⁻ ¹.
  • The LMD provided a practical method for measuring emissions related to animal behavior rather than diet.

Abstract

Mitigating enteric methane in the humid tropics, particularly in the Colombian Amazonian foothills, remains challenging due to limited field-based data under real grazing conditions. This study evaluated the performance of a laser methane detector (LMD) as a non-invasive alternative to traditional techniques, providing the first field-based validation of this approach in Amazonian grazing systems. Two contrasting production systems were compared: a silvopastoral system (SPS) with trees and shrubs, and a grass monoculture (traditional pasture, TP). A crossover design (two groups of five cows) was implemented across four periods. The LMD enabled repeated, activity measurements without disrupting natural behavior, capturing emissions during grazing, ruminating, resting, and milking. Daily CH₄ emissions were significantly lower in SPS than TP (233 ± 6.95 vs. 277 ± 8.87 g CH₄ animal ⁻ ¹ day ⁻ ¹; p < 0.0001). Methane intensity also decreased in SPS when expressed per kg milk (15.5 vs. 20.7 g CH₄ kg ⁻ ¹), energy-corrected milk (16.0 vs. 21.2 g CH₄ kg ⁻ ¹), and dry matter intake (18.9 vs. 26.7 g CH₄ kg DMI ⁻ ¹; all p < 0.0001). Classification was based on animal activity rather than diet, allowing detailed behavioral associations with CH₄ release dynamics. While the LMD requires strict environmental protocols and does not capture continuous 24-h data, its portability and non-invasive nature make it a practical, scalable tool for tropical field conditions. These results provide novel evidence supporting SPS as a mitigation strategy, strengthen GHG inventories in tropical livestock systems, and offer guidance for policymakers promoting sustainable production systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Narváez-Herrera et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe7cc1c9540dea8109e4https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337719
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper