Experiment demonstrates that combining narrow irrigation limits with moderate nitrogen boosts okra yield and health.
Optimizing water and nitrogen (N) management is critical for enhancing crop productivity under water scarcity. This study aimed to determine if a high irrigation upper limit can compensate for a low lower limit and whether optimal N application can mitigate the impacts of a wide irrigation range in okra. A pot experiment was conducted with three irrigation ranges (defined by the lower and upper limits of soil field capacity, FC) and two N rates: W1 (45–55% FC), W2 (35–65% FC), W3 (25–75% FC) and N1 (110 kg ha⁻1), N2 (220 kg ha⁻1). Results demonstrated that a high upper limit could not compensate for the adverse effects of a low lower limit. The narrow irrigation range (W1) consistently outperformed wider ranges, increasing yield by up to 42.3% compared to the wide irrigation range (W3). Moderate N application (N1) effectively alleviated the impacts associated with W3, boosting its yield by 24.9%, whereas excessive N (N2) was often detrimental. The optimal W1N1 combination synergistically enhanced system performance, achieving the highest yield (56.7% greater than the poorest N2W3 treatment), improving fruit quality (e.g., 11.5% higher soluble sugar), and increasing soil urease activity by 25.9%. Conversely, N2 led to soil acidification and nutrient imbalance. These results demonstrate that coupling a narrow irrigation limit range with moderate N is an optimal strategy for enhancing okra productivity and soil health, providing a viable guide for sustainable cultivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: