Mixed-methods evaluation reveals coordination improves WASH outcomes in humanitarian crises, suggesting effective strategies for funding.
We found that incorporating the ToC into the Minimum Requirements successfully supported humanitarian WASH responses. Additionally, while staffing levels are necessary to achieve response outputs and outcomes, they are not sufficient. Other factors, such as poor funding, inadequate monitoring and evaluation, and a need for localization, also impacted response outputs and outcomes. In a time of reduced humanitarian funding, investment in Global WASH Cluster coordination has shown to enhance response outputs and outcomes. Recommendations include dedicating staffing, developing standardized monitoring and assessment tools, strengthening inter-sectoral collaboration, and continuing accountability to affected populations. Further research on monitoring and evaluation, funding, affected population needs, and sub-national coordination is indicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nguyen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: