PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Artificial Intelligence in Education3 citationsOpen Access

Artificial intelligence in higher education: a bibliometric analysis of research trends (2015–2024)

View Full Paper
NMNiti MittalGBGeetanjali BatraRSRajeev Sijariya

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to explore the evolution of artificial intelligence research in higher education from 2015 to 2024.
  • Analyzed 1,671 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus using the PRISMA framework.
  • Conducted performance analysis and scientific mapping to assess research output and collaboration patterns.
  • Identified trends at document, author, country, institution, and keyword levels.
  • Found a 67% annual growth rate in publications, especially significant after 2022.
  • Noted a rise in output from 353 articles in 2023 to 927 in 2024 following ChatGPT's release.
  • Highlighted a thematic shift towards issues like academic integrity, assessment challenges, and AI ethics in highly cited articles.

Abstract

Purpose Previous research on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has predominantly focused on specific tools and outcomes. Few studies provide data-driven insights into its evolution, particularly in the period after the launch of ChatGPT. This study addresses this gap through a bibliometric analysis of publications on Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education from 2015 to 2024, mapping research output, collaboration patterns, and citation trends. Design/methodology/approach A total of 1,671 peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in Scopus were analyzed based on the PRISMA framework. Using performance analysis and scientific mapping, the study examined the AIEd research landscape to offer document, author, country, institution, and keyword-level insights. Findings The publications depict a 67% annual growth rate, especially after 2022, with output tripling from 353 in 2023 to 927 in 2024, coinciding with the release of ChatGPT. Most highly cited articles focus on generative AI, signifying a thematic shift towards AI-driven academic concerns like academic integrity, assessment challenges, and AI ethics. Practical implications The findings can guide universities in implementing AI literacy initiatives, embedding ethical safeguards, and shaping evidence-based institutional and policy frameworks for responsible AI integration. Originality/value This study captures the trajectory of AI in higher education over the past decade. It highlights a significant thematic shift in research following the emergence of ChatGPT, which has not yet been comprehensively assessed. The findings of the study are poised to shape the direction of future research in the field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mittal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ff08c1c9540dea811b7fhttps://doi.org/10.1108/aiie-04-2025-0076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Authentic and Creative Assessment in a World with AI2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education2022 · 791 citations
  3. 3Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field2023 · 1,722 citations
  4. 4Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education2017 · 1,952 citations
  5. 5Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement2009 · 65,005 citations