Key result
Moderate-to-severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis was associated with significantly lower myocardial contraction fraction compared to mild AS and controls (31.95% vs 35.35% and 40.72%; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Severe aortic stenosis management emphasizes symptoms and LVEF, so this study assessed the correlation between MCF and HRV in asymptomatic AS patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Observational (n=79)
Reduced myocardial contraction fraction correlates with impaired heart rate variability in asymptomatic aortic stenosis, suggesting these parameters may help identify early physiologic dysfunction for risk stratification.
May aid early physiologic risk stratification in asymptomatic AS; extends prior observational links but leaves open prospective validation.
Objectives Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF), a volumetric index of myocardial performance independent of chamber size, is significantly reduced in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and has been proposed as a prognostic marker1,2. Heart rate variability (HRV), reflecting autonomic regulation of cardiac function, is similarly decreased in severe AS due to reduced parasympathetic activity and has demonstrated prognostic relevance, with improvements noted following intervention3–5. Nevertheless, current management algorithms for severe AS primarily emphasize symptomatic status and left ventricular ejection fraction6,7. In this study, we aimed to assess the correlation between MCF and HRV in asymptomatic AS patients with preserved ejection fraction. Methods A total of 79 patients were retrospectively included in the study. Participants with a diagnosis of hypertension and without significant valvular disease comprised the control group. The study population was classified into three groups: mild aortic stenosis, moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis, and controls. Conventional echocardiographic parameters, as well as MCF and HRV indices, were compared across the groups. Additionally, the correlation between MCF and HRV parameters was assessed. Results Moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis group exhibited significantly lower MCF compared to the mild AS and controls (31.95 ± 6.1% vs. 35.35 ± 5.2% and 40.72 ± 4.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). HRV parameters were also significantly reduced in AS patients: SDNN-24 (p = 0.038), SDNN index (p = 0.006), RMSSD (p = 0.016), and pNN50 (p = 0.018). No significant differences were observed in LVEF, LVEDV, or LVESV between groups. MCF demonstrated a significant positive correlation with SDNN-24 (r = 0.375, p = 0.009), SDANN index (r = 0.385, p = 0.008), and SDNN index (r = 0.416, p = 0.004). Conclusion Reduced MCF was associated with impaired HRV in aortic stenosis patients, indicating early physiologic dysfunction. MCF and HRV may assist in risk stratification of asymptomatic individuals.Correlation of MCF with SDNN MCF by groups
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Govdeli et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Asymptomatic aortic stenosis (n=79). Moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis vs. Mild aortic stenosis and hypertensive controls was evaluated on Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) (p=< 0.001). Moderate-to-severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis was associated with significantly lower myocardial contraction fraction compared to mild AS and controls (31.95% vs 35.35% and 40.72%; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: