Retrospective study evaluates outcomes of biliary duct injury management, suggesting effective treatment strategies.
Background and study aims: Biliary surgery is a common procedure, especially cholecystectomy (CCT). Its main adverse event (AE) is biliary duct injury (BDI). Management is poorly codified, particularly for complex BDIs not related to CCT (NONCCT-BDI). We decided to conduct a study in a tertiary center to evaluate clinical outcomes of BDI management. Patients and methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients diagnosed with a BDI between March 2002 and June 2022 was performed. The primary endpoint was the overall success rate for BDI management. Secondary endpoints were outcomes of BDI related to CCT (CCT-BDI) and non-CCT-BDI according to BDI location, need for a combination of procedures, and AEs. Results: Sixty-four patients were included. The overall success rate was 91.8%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) alone was efficient in 97.4% of patients. Endoscopy was key to successful treatment in 69% of patients. Forty-five percent of cases were non-CCT-BDI and the treatment success rate was 88.9%. The treatment success rate was significantly higher for Strasberg A BDIs (P = 0.0337). Conclusions: ERCP remains the best and least invasive treatment for hilar injuries, as evidenced by a high success rate. Management of NON-CCT-BDIs should be modeled after that of CCT-BDIs. Owing to the need for a combination of treatments, complex hilar injuries must be managed in expert centers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garbay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: