Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meta-analysis reveals brain activation differences in figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism, suggesting underlying neurobiological factors.
Background Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) consistently exhibit difficulties in comprehending figurative language. While prior neuroimaging studies have identified discrepancies in brain activation between ASD individuals and neurotypical controls (NCs) during such tasks, the specific and consistent neural patterns underlying these deficits remain unclear. Methods We conducted an activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis to identify consistent brain activation patterns associated with figurative language comprehension in ASD. A systematic literature search was performed across five databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang) up to January 31, 2025. Six functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies, comprising 95 individuals with ASD and 98 NCs, met the inclusion criteria. Results The analysis revealed that during figurative language comprehension, both ASD and NCs consistently activated a core network involving the bilateral superior temporal gyrus (STG), transverse temporal gyrus, and right insula. A conjunction analysis confirmed the stability of these shared regions. Crucially, the meta-analysis of group differences (NCs > ASD) identified a significant cluster of hypoactivation in the ASD group within the left STG and middle temporal gyrus (MTG). No significant hyperactivation was found in the ASD group compared to NCs. Conclusion This meta-analysis demonstrates that while individuals with ASD recruit typical language networks during figurative language comprehension, they exhibit a consistent pattern of reduced neural recruitment in the left STG and MTG. This hypoactivation may reflect a dual deficit encompassing reduced efficiency in semantic access/integration and impaired socio-linguistic integration, providing a neurobiological substrate for the pragmatic language difficulties characteristic of ASD. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42023467185 , CRD42023467185.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: