Demonstrates a formal model for morphic resonance in complex systems, indicating it stems from historical influences on topology.
Morphic resonance—the hypothesis that formative influences persist across time and space, making patterns of organization more likely to recur the more often they have occurred—lacks a formal physical model. This paper proposes that morphic resonance can be understood as the evolution of a topological phase in the state-space of a complex system. We build upon a foundational model where stable morphologies are represented as eigen-configurations (attractors) of an underlying causal graph, characterized by a Morphogenetic Potential, U. We then introduce a critical dynamic extension: the graph itself evolves via a History Tensor, H(t), which encodes the system's past states. This results in a time-modulated potential, U(s,t) = U₀(s) exp(-αH(s,t)), where recursive historical instantiations deepen the attractor basins of specific eigen-forms. This formalism translates "habit" into mathematics, predicting hysteresis, increased stability, and decreased convergence time for repeated forms. We thereby reframe morphic resonance not as a mysterious force, but as the natural consequence of a system whose topological landscape of possible forms is recursively shaped by its own history.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khang Lui (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: