Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bibliometric analysis maps evolving ESG and monetary risks in Eurozone economies, suggesting new governance implications.
This paper investigates how monetary and ESG-related risks—especially those stemming from asymmetric policy transmission across Eurozone economies—have evolved over time, with a focus on the post-COVID-19 era. Using a mixed-method bibliometric analysis of 216 peer-reviewed articles (1996–2025), it maps thematic developments in monetary governance and sustainability discourse. Findings reveal a post-2020 surge in scholarly engagement, marked by a decisive shift: ESG risks, once peripheral, are now central to discussions of macro-financial stability and institutional resilience. This thematic realignment aligns with major EU regulatory milestones (e.g., SFDR, EU Taxonomy, CSRD), signaling a structural transformation in EU governance. The study concludes that the convergence of monetary asymmetry and ESG integration represents a new frontier in economic policy and academic inquiry, raising critical questions about institutional convergence, regulatory capacity, and sustainability-informed monetary frameworks in post-crisis Europe.
Garefalakis et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: