Bidirectional proof framework shows helical structure of Riemann Zeta function zeros, suggesting novel insights.
We present a bidirectional proof framework for the Riemann Hypothesis composed of twoone-sided arguments: a necessity direction and a uniqueness direction. The first direction is geometric. It shows that a non-degenerate helical phase–amplitudelocking of the Dirichlet walk necessarily produces analytic cancellation, and that suchperfect helices can occur only on the critical line Re(s) = 1/2. The second direction is structural and number-theoretic. It interprets a zero as ano-distortion state between a discrete Dirichlet sum and its canonical linear/analyticsurrogate, and proves that in a deterministic setting this discrete–continuous gap admitsa unique intrinsic mediation pattern. Any admissible one-sided zero-witness must thereforeinstantiate the same underlying structure, identified here with the helical mechanism. Extensive numerical experiments on the first 10000 nontrivial zeros exhibit a sharp andexclusive helical signature, providing strong empirical support for the rigidity principleunderlying the argument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aviad Shetrit (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: