A current concepts review synthesizes core assessment strategies to mitigate ACL injuries among athletes, emphasizing intervention implications.
Background Hip and trunk (“core”) muscle dysfunction has emerged as a modifiable contributor to lower-limb biomechanics linked with non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Clinicians increasingly target core stability and control during injury-prevention screening and post-operative rehabilitation programs; however, the literature lacks a focused synthesis of core-directed strategies for ACL injury mitigation. The purpose of this current concepts review is to synthesize current evidence on hip- and core-focused assessment and rehabilitation strategies that may mitigate ACL injury risk. Design Current Concepts Review. Methods A narrative search of PubMed and Google Scholar (January 2000 – April 2025) identified biomechanical, prospective, interventional, and return-to-sport studies examining relationships between hip and/or trunk muscle function and ACL injury risk or recovery. Key findings were organized into (1) injury mechanisms, (2) screening and return-to-play (RTP) tests, and (3) preventive and rehabilitative interventions, with special attention to sex-specific evidence. Results Prospective and biomechanical studies consistently show that reduced hip abduction/extension strength and diminished trunk neuromuscular control predict dynamic knee valgus and elevated ACL strain. Functional assessments such as the single-leg step-down, Y-Balance, modified Star Excursion test, hop symmetry, and muscular assessment via belt-stabilized hand-held dynamometry—reliably identify high-risk athletes and persistently impaired post-ACLR patients. Multi-component neuromuscular programs emphasizing hip and core strengthening lower overall knee-ligament injury rates by 20–60 % in youth cohorts, with larger effects in females. Early incorporation of hip/trunk exercises during rehabilitation post ACLR contributes to improved kinematics, hop performance, and patient-reported outcomes, although standardized parameters remain undefined. Conclusion Evidence supports routine integration of hip and trunk assessment and strengthening into ACL injury-mitigation, rehabilitation, and RTP decision-making protocols. Future research should refine trunk-specific evaluation tools and establish optimal exercise dosing across sexes and competition levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burnham et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: