This technical evaluation demonstrates reduced energy penalties in CCGT plants using EGR with PCC, suggesting a more efficient approach to carbon capture.
Integration of post-combustion carbon capture (PCC) units, using chemical solvent with combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) power plants offers a promising strategy for mitigating the escalating CO 2 emissions. Nevertheless, this technology does come at a cost. It penalizes the plant by reducing the net power and overall efficiency. This study investigates the techno-economic effect of EGR on the energy penalty caused by PCC in a natural gas-fired CCGT power plant simulated using Aspen Plus. The results indicate that the utilization of an optimized 0.33 EGR ratio significantly increases the molar concentration of CO 2 by 51%, from 5.44% to 8.22%, while concurrently reducing the oxygen concentration by 46.82%, from 10.56% to 5.61%. Additionally, EGR minimizes the reboiler heat load of PCC by 34.53% while limiting the net power output by less than 0.5%. Economic analysis reveals that the steam requirement of CO 2 capture decreases from $14.23/tonne CO 2 captured (without EGR) to $9.26/tonne CO 2 captured at an EGR of 0.33. Furthermore, this work also investigated the relationship between the concentration of CO 2 in the gas stream and subsequent solvent requirements in a PCC unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: