Background/Objectives: Accurate and reliable automated dermoscopic lesion classification remains challenging. This is due to pronounced dataset bias, limited expert-annotated data, and poor cross-dataset generalization of conventional supervised deep learning models. In clinical dermatology, these limitations restrict the deployment of data-driven diagnostic systems across diverse acquisition settings and patient populations. Methods: Motivated by these challenges, this study proposes a transformer-based, dermatology-specific foundation model. The model learns transferable visual representations from large collections of unlabeled dermoscopic images via self-supervised pretraining. It integrates large-scale dermatology-oriented self-supervised learning with a hierarchical vision transformer backbone. This enables effective capture of both fine-grained lesion textures and global morphological patterns. The evaluation is conducted across three publicly available dermoscopic datasets: ISIC 2018, HAM10000, and PH2. The study assesses in-dataset, cross-dataset, limited-label, ablation, and computational-efficiency settings. Results: The proposed approach achieves in-dataset classification accuracies of 94.87%, 97.32%, and 98.17% on ISIC 2018, HAM10000, and PH2, respectively. It outperforms strong transformer and hybrid baselines. Cross-dataset transfer experiments show consistent performance gains of 3.5–5.8% over supervised counterparts. This indicates improved robustness to domain shift. Furthermore, when fine-tuned with only 10% of the labeled training data, the model achieves performance comparable to fully supervised baselines. Conclusions: This highlights strong data efficiency. These results demonstrate that dermatology-specific foundation learning offers a principled and practical solution for robust dermoscopic lesion classification under realistic clinical constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasir et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: