PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Comparison of plyometric repeated sprint and plyometric aerobic training on physical performance in youth soccer players

View Full Paper
MSMohamed Amin SelmiRHRaouf HammamiHCHalil İbrahim Ceylan

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate how plyometric training integrated with either repeated-sprint sets or high-intensity interval training affects physical performance in youth soccer players.
  • Random assignment of 29 male soccer players (14-15 years) to two groups: PLYO-RSS and PLYO-HIIT.
  • Both groups participated in an 8-week training program, completing 20-minute sessions replacing part of regular training.
  • Physical fitness assessments included countermovement jump, repeated vertical jumps, sprinting tests, and physiological markers.
  • Significant improvements were observed in muscle power, sprint speed, and aerobic capacity with p-values ≤ 0.001.
  • No differentiation in effectiveness was found between the two training methods (RSS and HIIT).
  • Overall, both training combinations effectively enhanced physical fitness in the youth soccer cohort.

Abstract

High-intensity interval training (HIIT) and repeated-sprint sets (RSS) are established conditioning methods in soccer, yet their integration with plyometric training among highly trained youth soccer players remains underexplored. This study investigated the effects of an 8-week program combining plyometric training with either RSS (PLYO-RSS) or HIIT (PLYO-HIIT) on physical fitness in young soccer players. Twenty-nine male players (14-15 years) were randomly assigned to PLYO-RSS (n = 14) or PLYO-HIIT (n = 15). Both interventions lasted 20 minutes per session and replaced part of regular soccer training. Physical fitness assessments included countermovement jump (CMJ), 15-s repeated vertical jumps (15''RJ), five-jump test (5JT), 10 m and 30 m sprint, maximal aerobic speed (MAS), VO2max, and repeated sprint performance (total sprint time, best sprint, fatigue index). Physiological markers (lactate, rating of perceived exertion, and HRmax) were also monitored. Significant improvements over time were observed in muscle power, sprint speed, aerobic capacity, and repeated-sprint ability (p ≤ 0.001; η²p = 0.339-0.489). However, no main effects or group × time interaction effects were observed, indicating no evidence of differential responses between the two training modes. In conclusion, integrating plyometric training with either RSS or HIIT effectively enhances physical fitness in highly trained youth soccer players, offering flexible options for training prescription.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Selmi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffe7c1c9540dea812bdchttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37000-4
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Team Synergies in Sport: Theory and Measures2016 · 232 citations
  2. 2The assessment of the body fat percentage by skinfold thickness measurements in childhood and young adolescence1990 · 391 citations
  3. 3Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents2008 · 373 citations
  4. 4Effectiveness of Vertical versus Horizontal Plyometric Training on Stretch-Shortening Cycle Performance Enhancement in Adolescent Soccer Players2023 · 22 citations
  5. 5Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport and its acquisition: Implications for applied cognitive psychology2010 · 309 citations