PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Politics3 citationsOpen Access

Understanding military AI governance through the Advocacy Coalition Framework

MOMichal OnderčoMJMahmoud Javadi

Key Points

  • The aim is to examine military AI governance through the Advocacy Coalition Framework and identify key advocacy coalitions.
  • Analysis of advocacy coalitions related to military AI governance
  • Identification of 'tight regulation' and 'responsible use' coalitions
  • Evaluation of policy learning and coalition dynamics
  • The 'tight regulation' coalition seeks a binding treaty on AI technologies
  • The 'responsible use' coalition promotes voluntary conduct codes
  • Insights into the complexities of policy dynamics within military AI governance

Abstract

This article analyses military AI governance using the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), focusing on two key advocacy coalitions: the ‘tight regulation’ coalition which emerged in the context of the UN’s Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, and ‘responsible use’ coalition which emerged in the context of the REAIM Summits and the US-led Political Declaration on Responsible Military AI Use. The ‘tight regulation’ coalition advocates for a legally binding treaty to restrict certain AI technologies, while the ‘responsible use’ coalition emphasises voluntary codes of responsible conduct. Through the ACF lens, the study examines policy learning, coalition coordination, and evolving dynamics within this emerging policy domain.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onderčo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffe7c1c9540dea812c22https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957261417198
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper