Heteroatom functionalization of graphene is an effective strategy for designing more sustainable lithium-ion battery electrodes, as it can tune both interfacial adhesion and the electronic features of the carbon lattice. In this work, we investigated the interfacial compatibility between three graphene sheets—pristine graphene, graphene doped with one nitrogen atom (Graphene–N), and graphene doped with one sulfur atom (Graphene–S)—and three lignocellulosic binders (carboxymethylcellulose (CMC); coniferyl alcohol (LcnA); and sinapyl alcohol (LsiA)) using density functional theory (DFT). Geometries were optimized using CAM-B3LYP and M06-2X in combination with the LANL2DZ basis set, while ωB97X-D/LANL2DZ was employed for dispersion-consistent single-point refinements. The computed adsorption energies indicate that all binder–surface combinations are thermodynamically favorable within the present finite-model framework (ΔEint ≈ −22.6 to −31.1 kcal·mol−1), with LSiA consistently showing the strongest stabilization across surfaces. Nitrogen doping produces a modest but systematic strengthening of adsorption relative to pristine graphene for all binders and is accompanied by electronic signatures consistent with localized donor/basic sites while preserving the delocalized π framework. In contrast, sulfur doping yields a more binder-dependent response: it maintains strong stabilization for LSiA but weakens LCnA relative to pristine/N-doped sheets, consistent with an S-induced local distortion/polarizability pattern that can alter optimal π–π registry depending on the adsorption geometry. A combined interpretation of adsorption energies, electronic descriptors (including ΔEgap as a model-dependent HOMO–LUMO separation), and topological analyses (AIM, ELF, LOL, and MEP) supports that Graphene–N provides the best overall balance between electronic continuity and chemically active interfacial sites, whereas Graphene–S can enhance localized anchoring but introduces more heterogeneous, lone-pair–dominated domains that may partially perturb electronic connectivity.
Fernández et al. (Sat,) studied this question.