PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026HemaSphere1 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic value of flow cytometry in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS): Composition of a FCM‐prognostic score (FCM‐PS) for overall survival

View Full Paper
ASAida SantaolallaKing's College LondonLSLeonie SaftKarolinska University HospitalSWSusann WinterUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a flow cytometry score that predicts overall survival in patients with myelodysplastic neoplasms.
  • Conducted flow cytometry on bone marrow samples from therapy-naïve MDS patients and healthy donors.
  • Used uni- and multivariate Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier curves for prognostic analysis.
  • Employed receiver operating characteristic curves to compare the predictive power of FCM-parameters with established scores.
  • Developed a prognostic score based on six significant FCM-parameters.
  • The new flow cytometry prognostic score outperformed existing prognostic models for overall survival.
  • Patients with low scores in the FCM-PS showed significantly better overall survival.
  • The FCM-PS demonstrated good discriminatory performance with an area under the curve of 0.70 in validation studies.

Abstract

Abstract Flow cytometry (FCM) is a co‐criterion in myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) diagnostics, currently not used for prognostication. This study aimed to develop an FCM‐score predicting overall survival (OS) in MDS to improve early clinical patient prognostication. FCM of bone marrow samples was performed for diagnostic purposes in 509 therapy‐naïve MDS patients and 77 healthy donors. The following methodology was used: (1) uni‐ and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan–Meier curves for OS to assess FCM‐parameters' prognostic value; (2) receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to test the prognostic superiority of FCM‐parameters versus established FCM‐scores and clinical risk‐scores; and (3) development of a FCM‐prognostic score (FCM‐PS) based on six FCM‐parameters with independent prognostic impact. The final FCM‐PS included aberrancies of progenitor cells (increased CD45 mean fluorescence intensity MFI‐ratio of lymphocytes and myeloid progenitor cells, decreased % of lymphatic progenitor cells), granulopoiesis (increased CD33 MFI, decreased sideward scatter SSC‐ratio of granulopoiesis and lymphocytes), lymphocytes (increased % of B‐lymphocytes), and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (increased %). FCM‐PS outperformed established scores for OS (hazard ratio HR 4.08 95% CI 2.54−6.55 vs. Ogata‐score: 2.44 1.61−3.70, International Prognostic Scoring System‐Revised IPSS‐R: 2.37 1.61–3.49, International Prognostic Scoring System‐Molecular IPSS‐M: 0.816 0.303–2.196). Patients in the FCM‐PS low score category showed significantly better OS (P < 0.0001). Further, FCM‐PS allowed discrimination within IPSS‐R area under the curve AUC: 0.70 vs. 0.62) and IPSS‐M (AUC: 0.75 vs. 0.48) subgroups. Validation of the prognostic FCM‐PS in an independent patient cohort confirmed good discrimination performance (AUC: 0.70). We introduce a unique, easy‐to‐use prognostic FCM‐PS score (panel: CD45/CD34/CD117/CD33/CD19/CD123/HLA‐DR) for OS in MDS, allowing refined risk stratification for IPSS‐R subgroups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santaolalla et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fff5c1c9540dea812eb4https://doi.org/10.1002/hem3.70293
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of five diagnostic flow cytometry scores in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Diagnostic power and prognostic impact2021 · 26 citations
  2. 2The myelodysplastic syndromes flow cytometric score: a three-parameter prognostic flow cytometric scoring system2015 · 52 citations
  3. 3A simple score derived from bone marrow immunophenotyping is important for prognostic evaluation in myelodysplastic syndromes2020 · 5 citations
  4. 4The flow cytometry myeloid progenitor count: A reproducible parameter for diagnosis and prognosis of myelodysplastic syndromes2021 · 15 citations
  5. 5A single‐tube flow cytometric procedure for enhancing the diagnosis and prognostic classification of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes2017 · 14 citations