Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores properties of accretive partial transpose matrices, revealing their connections to matrix means.
Accretive partial transpose (APT) matrices have been recently defined, as a natural extension of positive partial transpose (PPT) matrices. In this paper, we discuss further properties of APT matrices in a way that extends some of those properties known for PPT matrices. Among many results, we show that if A , B , X are n × n complex matrices such that A , B are sectorial with sector angle α for some α ∈ [0, π /2), and if f : (0, ∞ ) → (0, ∞ ) is a certain operator monotone function such that <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mfenced close="]" open="["> <m:mrow> <m:mtable class="matrix"> <m:mtr> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>cos</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>A</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mtd> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:mi>X</m:mi> </m:mtd> </m:mtr> <m:mtr> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>X</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>*</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mtd> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>cos</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>α</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mtd> </m:mtr> </m:mtable> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:math> $[{matrix} {cos}²(α )f(A) & X \\ {X}^{{}} & {cos}²(α )f(B) {matrix}]$ is APT, Then <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <m:mfenced close="]" open="["> <m:mrow> <m:mtable class="matrix"> <m:mtr> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>A</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>∇</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>B</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mtd> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:mi>X</m:mi> </m:mtd> </m:mtr> <m:mtr> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mi>X</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mo>*</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:mtd> <m:mtd columnalign="center"> <m:mi>f</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mi>A</m:mi> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>∇</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>t</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mi>B</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mtd> </m:mtr> </m:mtable> </m:mrow> </m:mfenced> </m:math> [matrix f(A)∇ ₜf(B) & X \\ X^ & f(A∇ ₜB) matrix] <jats:inline-graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldabbas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: