Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review shows ankle bracing prevents injuries in basketball players, suggesting a practical public health solution.
Ankle injuries are among the most common sports injuries in basketball and represent a substantial public health and economic burden. This narrative review synthesises evidence on ankle bracing as external protective support and shows that ankle braces reduce the risk of both first-time injuries and ankle re-injuries in basketball players without significantly affecting sport-specific performance, such as sprinting, jumping, or changing direction. Similarly, despite earlier theoretical concerns, current evidence shows no increased risk of knee injury associated with the use of ankle bracing. Mechanistic studies indicate that protection is provided by limiting excessive frontal-plane motion, enhancing proprioceptive feedback, and increasing perceived joint stability. Economic analyses show that a single ankle injury generates considerable direct and indirect costs, whereas seasonal team-wide ankle bracing programmes are low cost per athlete and likely cost-effective at scale. As a public health measure, ankle bracing is practical and easily scalable in community and sports settings. Overall, routine ankle bracing is shown to be a feasible, low-cost strategy for primary and secondary prevention of ankle injuries in basketball without compromising performance, and may support broader participation goals aligned with Sport for All principles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slivšek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: