This scoping review examines the impact of insurance on healthcare utilization and expenses, suggesting improvements for financial protection.
Universal Health Coverage places strong emphasis on health insurance as a strategy to ensure need-based care without financial hardship, yet its direct impact on healthcare utilisation and expenditure remains unclear. This scoping review maps recent evidence on how insurance influences both service use and out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE), including catastrophic health expenditure(CHE) , by examining studies published between 2018 and early 2024. Using the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework and PRISMA-Scr checklist, the review included only studies that reported both utilisation and expenditure outcomes within the same context. Ten eligible studies were identified. Overall, the findings indicate that enrolment in health insurance schemes generally increases healthcare utilisation, although the effect varies by type of service and is not universal across all care categories. Evidence also shows that insurance contributes to reducing OOPE, but the magnitude of this effect depends heavily on the design and generosity of the insurance scheme. In contrast, CHE does not demonstrate a clear or consistent association with insurance coverage, suggesting gaps in financial protection. These results highlight the need for policy attention to benefit package design, depth of coverage, and inclusion of diverse service types to strengthen financial risk protection across different health system settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reshu Agrawal Sagtani (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: