PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology11 citationsOpen Access

Unveiling the tumor microenvironment in colorectal cancer therapeutic resistance

View Full Paper
JHJiyu HanWLWeitian LiangKLKai Li

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore how the tumor microenvironment contributes to therapeutic resistance in colorectal cancer.
  • Review of current literature on tumor microenvironment components in CRC
  • Analysis of immune and non-cellular factors influencing drug resistance
  • Discussion of potential TME-targeted therapies
  • Identified key immune cells involved in forming immunosuppressive networks
  • Highlighted mechanisms like cytokine secretion and metabolic reprogramming promoting chemoresistance
  • Outlined how non-cellular factors exacerbate resistance through processes like epithelial-mesenchymal transition

Abstract

Therapeutic resistance remains a major barrier to effective treatment in colorectal cancer (CRC), where the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a pivotal role in modulating responses to chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. This review synthesizes current evidence on how cellular and non-cellular TME components contribute to resistance mechanisms in CRC. Key immune cells, including T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells, orchestrate immunosuppressive networks that impair drug efficacy. For instance, regulatory T cells and M2-polarized macrophages promote chemoresistance via cytokine secretion and metabolic reprogramming, while neutrophils and myeloid-derived suppressor cells hinder immune checkpoint blockade through extracellular trap formation and T-cell exhaustion. Non-cellular elements, such as extracellular matrix remodeling, hypoxia-induced metabolic shifts, and dysregulated cytokines like IL-6 and TGF-β, further exacerbate resistance by fostering epithelial-mesenchymal transition and angiogenesis. Tables highlight specific molecular axes and therapeutic implications. By elucidating these interactions, this article underscores the potential of TME-targeted strategies, such as macrophage reprogramming, cytokine inhibition, and combination therapies, to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes in CRC patients. Future research should prioritize integrating TME biomarkers for personalized treatment approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Han et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843371f1d9ada3c1fb0924https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1753180
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Butyrate-mediated Resistance to Trichostatin A Accompanied by Elevated Expression of Glucose Transporter 3 (GLUT3) in Human Colorectal Carcinoma HCT116 Cells2023 · 5 citations
  2. 2Reprogramming immunosuppressive myeloid cells by activated T cells promotes the response to anti-PD-1 therapy in colorectal cancer2021 · 106 citations
  3. 3Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) Upregulates CXCR7 and Contributes to Chemotherapy Resistance in Colorectal Cancer2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Bufalin targets the SRC-3/MIF pathway in chemoresistant cells to regulate M2 macrophage polarization in colorectal cancer2021 · 63 citations
  5. 5ROS/PI3K/Akt and Wnt/β-catenin signalings activate HIF-1α-induced metabolic reprogramming to impart 5-fluorouracil resistance in colorectal cancer2022 · 471 citations