Systematic review finds resistance exercise improves liver health in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, suggesting a safe alternative to aerobic exercise.
Objective The aim is to systematically assess the impact of resistance exercise on patients diagnosed with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on resistance exercise for MASLD/NAFLD were sourced from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and CNKI databases, (covering all entries from inception to 18 March 2025. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was utilized for quality evaluation, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for conducting the meta-analysis. Results Eleven RCTs, involving 395 participants, were included in the analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were significantly decreased (MD = −4.44 U/L, 95% CI = −8.84 to −0.03, Z = 1.98, P = 0.05). No significant difference was observed in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels (MD = −0.18 U/L, 95% CI = −6.70 to 6.34, Z = 0.05, P = 0.96). Among the eight imaging assessment studies, seven reported substantial reductions in liver fat content, whereas one study indicated no effect. No significant difference in clinical compliance was detected between the groups (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.10, P = 0.92), and no serious adverse events were documented. Conclusion Resistance exercise notably enhances ALT levels and hepatic steatosis in patients with MASLD. The recommended minimum effective dosage is whole-body multi-muscle training, consisting of 8–10 exercises at 60%–80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) intensity, performed at least three times weekly for a minimum of 12 weeks. This intervention is particularly advantageous for patients with elevated ALT levels who are unable to tolerate aerobic exercise, and it appears to be safe. Nonetheless, further research involving larger sample sizes is required to confirm its long-term efficacy. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251050504 , identifier CRD420251050504.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: