PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Diachronica1 citations

Evolution of differential object marking in Macedonian dialects

View Full Paper
KKKirill KozhanovISIlja A. SeržantEBEleni Bužarovska

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate the evolution of the differential object marking system in Macedonian dialects across two time periods.
  • Compared Southern Macedonian texts from the mid-19th century and mid-20th century.
  • Analyzed factors conditioning differential object marking, including animacy, definiteness, and lexical class.
  • Examined frequency and consistency of na-marking in various contexts.
  • Observed a general increase in the use of na-marking over time.
  • Noted a shift from optional to more automated marking in later texts.
  • Found that pronouns and human proper names are almost always marked in the later period, while marking of definite common nouns remained optional.

Abstract

Abstract By the late Middle Ages, a part of South Slavic, including Macedonian and Bulgarian, had lost nominal case inflection, leading to the disappearance of the old Slavic differential object marking (DOM) system. In the 19th century, some southern Macedonian dialects developed a new DOM system based on the preposition na ‘on, to’. This study explores the evolution of this DOM system by comparing Southern Macedonian texts from two periods — the mid-19th century and mid-20th century. The main factors conditioning DOM include animacy (humanness), definiteness, and the lexical class of the verb. We observe a general increase in the na -marking and a shift from optionality toward automatization. In early texts, the na -marking sporadically occurs with pronouns and definite human-referring nouns. In later texts, pronouns and human proper names are almost always marked, whereas marking of definite human-referring common nouns remains optional, albeit with increasing frequency over time. We also report negative evidence for other factors frequently mentioned in typological works on DOM, such as the disambiguating function of case within the global discourse context. Notably, this factor does not emerge as significant in Macedonian.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kozhanov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843383f1d9ada3c1fb0bc3https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.24047.koz
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A typology of positional differential argument marking2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2A typological perspective on Differential Object Marking2014 · 171 citations
  3. 32. Towards grammaticalization of clitic doubling: Clitic doubling in Macedonian and neighbouring languages2008 · 10 citations
  4. 4Statistics for Linguistics with R2021 · 123 citations
  5. 5An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests.2009 · 2,636 citations