PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Frontiers in Immunology3 citationsOpen Access

Systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension and pulmonary fibrosis: exploring biomarker discriminators with advanced omics in a Caucasian cohort

View Full Paper
NMNada Mohamed-AliVAVanessa AcquaahMAManeera Al-Jaber

Key Points

  • The study aims to identify biomarkers that can differentiate between SSc patient groups with and without pulmonary involvement.
  • Employed Olink-based proteomics and untargeted metabolomics to analyze patient samples.
  • Compared three SSc patient cohorts and healthy controls using advanced omics technologies.
  • Conducted protein-protein and metabolite-metabolite interaction analyses to identify distinct molecular signatures.
  • Elevated MCP-1, MCP-3, and MCP-4 levels in SSc-PF compared to all groups.
  • Identification of distinct metabolites exclusive to SSc-PAH, such as quinolinate and dimethylarginines.
  • A candidate biomarker panel of cytokines and metabolites was proposed for differentiating SSc conditions.

Abstract

Introduction Systemic sclerosis (Scleroderma; SSc) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (SSc-PAH) and pulmonary fibrosis (SSc-PF). Effective risk stratification and treatment of SSc remains a significant challenge. This proof-of-concept study aimed to identify potential biomarkers capable of distinguishing between three SSc patient groups, defined by no pulmonary involvement (SSc-NLD; n=30), SSc-PAH (n=30), SSc-PF (n=30) compared to healthy controls (HC; n=30). Methods The study employed Olink-based proteomics using the Cardiovascular II and Immuno-oncology panels, and untargeted metabolomic profiling using Ultra-high Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectroscopy (UPLC-MS/MS), to discover distinct molecular signatures. Results Proteomics analysis revealed significantly elevated levels of MCP-1, MCP-3, and MCP-4 in SSc-PF compared to all other groups. However, no robust discriminatory cytokines were identified for SSc-PAH or SSc-NLD. Validation of systemic MCP-1 and IL-6 by ELISA supported the proteomics findings. IL-33 levels were found to be reduced in the SSc-PAH group. Increased levels of pro-inflammatory sIL-6R were also identified in SSc-PAH and SSc-PF, indicating shared inflammatory pathways. Protein-protein interaction analyses demonstrated greater network complexity in SSc-PF, with pathway analysis suggesting overlapping biological mechanisms across pulmonary groups. Metabolomics analysis uncovered a unique panel of metabolites altered exclusively in SSc-PAH, including quinolinate, dimethylarginines, hydroxyasparagine and orotidine. In contrast, no metabolites were uniquely discriminatory for SSc-PF or SSc-NLD. Metabolite-metabolite interaction networks revealed nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism as the more significantly enriched metabolic pathways in SSc-PAH. Correlation analyses identified distinct protein-metabolite profiles across groups. Of note is the loss of IL-33-related metabolic associations specific to SSc-PAH. Discussion This study identified a candidate biomarker panel comprising three cytokines and ten metabolites capable of differentiating between SSc-PAH, SSc-PF, SSc-NLD, and HC. Biomarkers of SSc-PAH were linked to nicotinate and nicotinamide, as well as tryptophan metabolism, whereas those of SSc-PF reflected immune cell infiltration and fibrosis. These findings highlight the potential biomarker panels for diagnosis and targeted therapeutic development.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mohamed-Ali et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843383f1d9ada3c1fb0bd3https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1755076
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper