PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Spinal Cord0 citationsOpen Access

Implementing body composition assessment into clinical practice in patients with acute spinal cord injury- a pilot feasibility study

View Full Paper
KDKatherine J. DesnevesBFBryn FittallRoyal Rehabilitation CentreCEChantelle ElsonAustin Health

Key Points

  • The study aims to implement a specific care pathway for body composition assessment in individuals with acute spinal cord injury and evaluate its feasibility.
  • Conducted a prospective mixed methods implementation study
  • Participants included patients with new traumatic spinal cord injury
  • Collected feasibility outcomes from medical records and conducted semi-structured interviews
  • Explored patient and clinician experiences regarding the care pathway
  • Twenty-three patients were eligible, with 21 consenting to participate (91%)
  • Initial adherence to the assessment pathway was 86%, but decreased to 69% beyond 8 weeks
  • Only 43% completed all required bioimpedance spectroscopy measurements
  • Identified themes included physiological changes impacting rehabilitation and barriers to optimal care

Abstract

Abstract Study design Prospective mixed methods implementation study. Objectives To: (1) implement a SCI-specific care pathway for body composition assessment (ATSCI-Nut); (2) pilot test the feasibility (reach, adoption, adherence, appropriateness, and acceptability) of the care pathway in patients with new traumatic SCI; (3) explore patient experiences with the care pathway and the effect of providing body composition information on dietary choices and (4) explore clinician experiences with the new care pathway. Setting Victorian Spinal Cord Service, Australia Methods Participants included individuals with acute SCI who received the ATSCI-Nut pathway and consented to data collection. Feasibility outcomes (reach, adoption and intervention fidelity) were collected from medical records. Acceptability and appropriateness were explored via patient semi-structured interviews and clinician focus groups. Results Twenty-three patients were eligible, 21 (91%) consented. Adherence to the ATSCI-Nut pathway initial assessment and review components during weeks 2–8 and >8 weeks was 86, 71 and 69%, respectively. Adherence to completing bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) measurements at specified time-points was 69%. However, only 43% of participants had all BIS measurements completed at specified time-points. Two themes were common to patients and clinicians: physiological and body composition changes directing focus of rehabilitation, and barriers and enablers to optimal care. One additional theme arose from patient interviews: impact of SCI on self-image and lifestyle. Conclusions The ATSCI-Nut pathway is a feasible and acceptable model to deliver body composition assessment despite mixed adherence to the pathway overall. However, barriers to optimal patient care and pathway adaptations need to be explored to improve adherence.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Desneves et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698433a5f1d9ada3c1fb0fcbhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-026-01169-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper