PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

Tides in Massive Binaries: Numerical Solutions and Semianalytical Comparisons

View Full Paper
M孙Meng 萌 Sun 孙H夏Hongbo 宏博 Xia 夏SGSeth Gossage

Key Points

  • To compare tidal secular evolution timescales in massive binary systems using numerical methods and semianalytic prescriptions.
  • Systematic comparison of tidal evolution timescales using direct numerical method and semianalytic approaches.
  • Focus on binary systems with masses ranging from 5 to 50 solar masses for primaries and 1.4 to 10 solar masses for companions.
  • Analysis of orbital periods between 0.5 and 50 days in the PSR J0045–7319 system.
  • Both numerical and semianalytic methods predict similar synchronization and orbital decay timescales before mass transfer.
  • Once mass transfer begins, discrepancies emerge in the predicted dissipation channels and their effects on orbital decay.
  • Numerical solutions aligned closely with observed values in PSR J0045–7319, while semianalytic predictions suggested much longer decay timescales.

Abstract

Abstract We present a systematic comparison between the tidal secular evolution timescales predicted by the direct numerical method and those given by the commonly used semianalytic prescriptions implemented in 1D hydrostatic binary evolution codes. Our study focuses on binary systems with intermediate- to high-mass primaries ( M 1 = 5–50 M ⊙ ), companion masses between 1.4 M ⊙ and 10 M ⊙ , and orbital periods ranging from 0.5–50 days. Before mass transfer, both approaches predict synchronization and orbital decay timescales that agree within ∼2 orders of magnitude and typically exceed the stellar main-sequence lifetime, implying negligible tidal impact on secular orbital evolution. However, the implied dissipation channels differ, and the differences become more pronounced once mass transfer begins. To test the theoretical predictions against observations, we apply both approaches to the well-characterized PSR J0045–7319 system, which has an orbital decay timescale of 0.5 Myr. The numerical solution reveals strong resonances with internal gravity waves, bringing the predicted orbital period change rate close to the observed value. In contrast, the semianalytic prescriptions predict orbital decay timescales longer than the Hubble time. These results suggest that for population studies, modestly calibrated parameterized equations may suffice, but for individual systems, reliable interpretation requires direct numerical approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

孙 et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698433baf1d9ada3c1fb10e2https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae2dff
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Tidal Circularization of Binaries by Resonance Locking. I. The Importance of the Pre-main Sequence2021 · 38 citations
  2. 2Matplotlib: A 2D Graphics Environment2007 · 40,924 citations
  3. 3Interaction of Close‐in Planets with the Magnetosphere of Their Host Stars. I. Diffusion, Ohmic Dissipation of Time‐dependent Field, Planetary Inflation, and Mass Loss2008 · 58 citations
  4. 4Orbital decay in binaries containing post-main-sequence stars2018 · 37 citations
  5. 5On the energetics of a tidally oscillating convective flow2023 · 11 citations