As 3D printing emerges as a transformative technology in construction, the structural performance of 3D-printed mortar (3DPM) has become a key research focus. This study conducted shear tests on reinforced specimens combining 3D-printed mortar (3DPM) and normal mortar (NM). Four different shapes of interfacial locking design (I-shaped, K-shaped, C-shaped, S-shaped) were examined, comparing reinforced (CR) and non-reinforced (NR) specimens. The investigation analyzed failure modes, crack propagation patterns, and shear transfer mechanisms at CR series specimens under direct shear loading. CR-S specimens exhibited a shear peak load value 14.0% higher than CR-K specimens, 33.2% higher than CR-C specimens, and 42.9% higher than CR-I specimens. CR-I specimens exhibited pure adhesive failure. CR-K, CR-C, and CR-S specimens showed composite failure patterns combining adhesive and shear failure mechanisms. Strain analysis revealed the maximum horizontal strain εxx across all specimen shapes. CR-C and CR-S specimens recorded strain values exceeding CR-I and CR-K specimens by over 50%. Reinforcement produced pronounced increases in ultimate bearing capacity for I-shaped and C-shaped specimens, achieving gains of 51.9% and 60.4%, respectively. Reinforcement substantially enhanced energy dissipation capacity. Compared with NR series specimens, the performance improvements ranked as follows: CR-C (+164.67%) > CR-S (+70.70%) > CR-I (+52.05%) > CR-K (+9.42%).
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.