Retrospective analysis evaluates biliary reconstruction techniques to minimize complications in liver transplantation.
Background: Multiple bile ducts in liver grafts presents a significant risk for biliary complications following living donor liver transplantation. However, a standardized approach for managing these cases remains unclear. We aim to evaluate various biliary reconstruction procedures and identify most effective strategies for minimizing complications. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 1780 microsurgical biliary reconstructions in living donor liver transplantation between 2006 and 2022. Outcomes were assessed based on the conduit used and anastomotic techniques focusing on duct-to-duct reconstructions, and duct-to-jejunum anastomoses. Technical refinements including biliary stent insertion, ipsilateral bile duct anastomosis, figure-of-8 suturing over junction of anastomosis, centralization anastomosis for size discrepancies were applied. Results: Among the 1780 living donor liver transplantations, 23.1% have multiple bile ducts. The biliary complication rate for single bile ducts was 11.2% (131/1169), while multiple bile ducts had 14.7% (58/394). Bile leaks were significantly higher in multiple bile duct grafts compared to single bile ducts (6.1% vs. 2.1%, p =0.001), with no significant difference in stricture formation ( p =0.76). In adult LDLT using right lobe graft, the 2-to-2 duct-to-duct reconstructions had the highest biliary complication rate of 16.6% (25/150), while duct-to-jejunum anastomoses with 2-to-2 configuration had the lowest biliary complication rate of 0% (0/21). Overall, there were significantly higher biliary complications among duct-to-duct than duct-to-jejunum anastomoses (12.5% vs 2.6%, p =0.001) in adult LDLT using right lobe graft. Conclusions: Duct-to-jejunum anastomoses offer a viable alternative with fewer complications for MBDs. Tailored strategies and technical refinements can mitigate the complications associated with MBD reconstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: