Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Quantitative analysis improves accuracy of trace element quantification in heterogeneous samples, suggesting verification with standards is essential.
Quantitative analysis using energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) has been shown to achieve high accuracy equivalent to that of wavelength-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (WDS) even in the case of highly overlapped X-ray peaks of major elements and high precision in the case of trace elements with concentrations below 1 wt.%. With reliable pulse pile-up correction, accurate, unnormalized EDS quantification was also demonstrated at count rates above 200 kcps. This work studies the EDS quantification of samples exhibiting these three analytical challenges simultaneously: quantification of trace elements (< 1 wt%), overlapping X-ray peaks of major elements (small peak on large peak), and high-count rates (to improve productivity of these measurements). A secondary standard was used to optimise and validate the collection conditions for the measurement of an unknown slag sample exhibiting a heterogeneous microstructure containing trace level of Mn. Accurate quantification down to 0.1 wt% and mapping of segregation in the order of 0.2wt% were possible with modern EDS technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spasevski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: