PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Computers5 citationsOpen Access

Research Advances in Maize Crop Disease Detection Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches

View Full Paper
TMThangavel MuruganAbu Dhabi UniversityNBNasurudeen Ahamed Noor Mohamed BadushaUnited Arab Emirates UniversityNMNura Shifa MusaAl Ain University

Key Points

  • This review aims to synthesize the application of machine learning and deep learning in detecting maize leaf diseases through image analysis.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines.
  • Analyzed 102 peer-reviewed papers from 2017 to 2025.
  • Categorized findings by disease type, dataset, learning approach, and performance metrics.
  • Evaluated the effectiveness of both traditional ML methods and deep learning architectures.
  • Traditional ML methods achieved classification accuracies between 79% and 100%.
  • Deep learning, particularly CNNs, reached superior classification performance up to 99.9% on benchmark datasets.
  • Performance often decreased in real-world conditions due to dataset bias and environmental factors.
  • The review highlights gaps in creating reliable, explainable, and scalable detection systems.

Abstract

Recent developments in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms have introduced a new approach to the automatic detection of plant diseases. However, existing reviews of this field tend to be broader than maize-focused and do not offer a comprehensive synthesis of how ML and DL methods have been applied to image-based detection of maize leaf disease. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review of 102 peer-reviewed papers published between 2017 and 2025 examined methods and approaches used to classify leaf images for detecting disease in maize plants. The 102 papers were categorized by disease type, dataset, task, learning approach, architecture, and metrics used to evaluate performance. The analysis results indicate that traditional ML methods, when combined with effective feature engineering, can achieve classification accuracies of approximately 79–100%, while DL, especially CNNs, provide consistent, superior classification performance on controlled benchmark datasets (up to 99.9%). Yet in “real field” conditions, many of these improvements typically decrease or disappear due to dataset bias, environmental factors, and limited evaluation. The review provides a comprehensive overview of emerging trends, performance trade-offs, and ongoing gaps in developing field-ready, explainable, reliable, and scalable maize leaf disease detection systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Murugan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843422f1d9ada3c1fb1ebchttps://doi.org/10.3390/computers15020099
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper