PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine5 citationsOpen Access

Strain-Specific Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Probiotics Efficacy in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

View Full Paper
RMRoman MaslennikovEGEva GosteevaVAVera Ananeva

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the efficacy of different probiotic strains in treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) through meta-analysis.
  • Conducted systematic review registered in the PROSPERO database.
  • Searched PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane for relevant randomized placebo-controlled trials.
  • Included studies evaluating single-strain probiotics compared to placebo in IBS patients.
  • Excluded studies that could not be meta-analyzed.
  • Included 32 articles evaluating 10 probiotic strains in the meta-analysis.
  • Key strains that improved IBS symptoms: Bifidobacterium longum 35624, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v, Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856, and Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2.
  • Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 improved quality of life for IBS patients.
  • Conflicting results for Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 and no efficacy demonstrated for Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17, or Lactobacillus casei Shirota.

Abstract

Background: Many probiotic strains have been studied in relation to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to identify probiotic strains demonstrating efficacy in the management of IBS based on meta-analyses of randomized placebo-controlled trials (RPCTs). Methods: This systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD420251047092). Searches were conducted in PubMed and Scopus on 8 April 2025. Additional completed studies with available results were identified through ClinicalTrials.gov. An additional search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), including records indexed in EMBASE, was conducted in December 2025 and did not identify any additional studies. RPCTs were included if they evaluated single-strain probiotics without additional active components compared with a placebo in patients with IBS. Studies whose results could not be meta-analyzed were excluded. Results: A total of 2643 records were identified; 32 articles evaluating 10 probiotic strains were included in the meta-analyses. Meta-analyses demonstrated the efficacy of Bifidobacterium longum (formerly Bifidobacterium infantis) 35624, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum 299v (DSM 9843), Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856, and Bacillus coagulans Unique IS2 (MTCC 5260) in improving key IBS symptoms. Meta-analyses also demonstrated that Bacillus coagulans MTCC 5856 improved quality of life for those with IBS. Conflicting results were observed for Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745. Meta-analyses did not demonstrate the efficacy of Escherichia coli Nissle 1917, Lactobacillus gasseri BNR17, or Lactobacillus casei Shirota. Conclusions: Several probiotic strains demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of IBS in meta-analyses of RPCTs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maslennikov et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843433f1d9ada3c1fb213dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031152
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper