Analysis of Michel Foucault’s reception shows evolving interpretations, suggesting a need for historicization and critique.
The paper examines how the reception of Michel Foucault’s works has been continually reshaped — from the published books to the Dits et Écrits, the Collège de France lectures, and recently released manuscipts from the archives. It identifies four major ‘families’ of this reception: philological engagements with the texts, attempts to update Foucault’s concepts for the analysis of contemporary society, methodological appropriation of his “toolbox” to new domains, and more speculative or de-historicized uses of his work. The paper argues that the foucauldian approach depends on two non-negotiable commitments: rigorous historicization and a focus on analysing changing modes of subjectivation. Together, these commitments define what Foucault later called the posture of critique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Judith Revel (2026) studied this question.