PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Advanced Healthcare Materials1 citationsOpen Access

SiO 2 ‐CaO CME /Poly(Tetrahydrofuran)/Poly(Caprolactone) 3D‐Printed Scaffolds Drive Human‐Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Osteogenic Differentiation

View Full Paper
DSDavid R. SoryAHAgathe HeyraudJJJulian R. Jones

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate the osteogenic properties of 3D-printed scaffolds for bone regeneration and the effects on human bone marrow stromal cells.
  • Utilized 3D-printed hybrid scaffolds made from SiO2‐CaO CME, poly(tetrahydrofuran), and poly(caprolactone).
  • Assessed cellular behavior, including viability, adhesion, and proliferation on scaffold surfaces.
  • Evaluated osteogenic differentiation through gene expression analysis and hydroxyapatite deposition.
  • 3D-printed scaffolds promoted osteogenic differentiation in human bone marrow stromal cells.
  • Key markers for osteogenesis, such as osteocalcin and collagen type I alpha 1 chain, were significantly upregulated.
  • Hydroxyapatite mineralization and organized extracellular matrix assembly were observed.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article addresses the unmet clinical need of scaffolds for bone regeneration that can combine osteogenic properties, such as the promotion of bone marrow stem cell differentiation into osteoblasts, with the ability to withstand cyclic loading. In our previous study, we demonstrated that discs of SiO 2 ‐CaO CME /poly(tetrahydrofuran)/poly(caprolactone) hybrids or their dissolution products can drive terminal osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells (h‐BMSCs) in vitro. The current study shows that the 3D‐printed hybrid scaffolds with physiologically relevant 3D architecture further promote h‐BMSC osteogenesis. The 3D‐printed scaffolds support spatially organized cell behavior in an environment mirroring conditions relevant to off‐the‐shelf implant applications. Primary cellular functions, including viability, adhesion, and proliferation, were maintained across 3D scaffold surfaces and within inter‐strut regions. osteogenic commitment was evidenced by the upregulation of lineage‐specific transcripts, hydroxyapatite deposition, and the organized assembly of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Our results demonstrate that 3D‐printed scaffolds drive osteogenesis by modulating cell metabolism, inducing osteogenic morphological transitions, and promoting the expression of osteocalcin and collagen type I alpha 1 chain, alongside hydroxyapatite matrix mineralization. Collectively, our findings highlight the SiO 2 ‐CaO CME /poly(tetrahydrofuran)/poly(caprolactone) scaffold's strong osteogenic properties—driven by composition, surface architecture, and ion release – and its promise for clinical bone regeneration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sory et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984345ff1d9ada3c1fb2799https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202503733
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper