Simulation experiments demonstrate PRA-DQN improves traffic efficiency in urban road networks, suggesting better congestion management.
Coordinated control across multiple signalized intersections is essential for mitigating congestion propagation in urban road networks. However, existing DQN-based approaches often suffer from unstable action switching, limited interpretability, and insufficient capability to model spatial spillback between adjacent intersections. To address these limitations, this study proposes a Policy-Regulated and Aligned Deep Q-Network (PRA-DQN) for cooperative multi-intersection signal control. A differentiable policy function is introduced and explicitly trained to align with the optimal Q-value-derived target distribution, yielding more stable and interpretable policy behavior. In addition, a cooperative reward structure integrating local delay, movement pressure, and upstream–downstream interactions enables agents to simultaneously optimize local efficiency and regional coordination. A parameter-sharing multi-agent framework further enhances scalability and learning consistency across intersections. Simulation experiments conducted on a 2 × 2 SUMO grid show that PRA-DQN consistently outperforms fixed-time, classical DQN, distributed DQN, and pressure/wave-based baselines. Compared with fixed-time control, PRA-DQN reduces maximum queue length by 21.17%, average queue length by 18.75%, and average waiting time by 17.71%. Moreover, relative to classical DQN coordination, PRA-DQN achieves an additional 7.53% reduction in average waiting time. These results confirm the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method in suppressing congestion propagation and improving network-level traffic performance. The proposed PRA-DQN provides a practical and scalable basis for real-time deployment of coordinated signal control and can be readily extended to larger networks and time-varying demand conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: