Key result
Combined PAPi-PAC assessment identifies distinct prognostic haemodynamic phenotypes after TAVI.
Why the study?
Does the combined assessment of pulmonary artery pulsatility index and pulmonary arterial capacitance stratify clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=77)
No
Does the combined assessment of pulmonary artery pulsatility index and pulmonary arterial capacitance stratify clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI?
Combined assessment of PAPi and PAC identifies distinct haemodynamic phenotypes and provides a physiologically grounded framework for postprocedural risk stratification following TAVI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid post-TAVI risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Right heart haemodynamics, including right ventricular function and pulmonary arterial capacitance (PAC), are important prognostic determinants in cardiovascular disease. However, their combined role in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine whether the combined assessment using pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and PAC can stratify clinical outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing TAVI.Methods This retrospective single-centre study included 77 patients with severe AS who underwent right heart catheterisation within 3 months before TAVI. Patients were stratified into four groups based on the median values of PAPi and PAC. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure-related hospitalisation.Results During a median follow-up of 3.60 years (interquartile range: 1.89–4.62), 15 patients experienced the primary endpoint. Kaplan–Meier’s analysis showed significant stratification by PAPi–PAC groups (log-rank p = 0.040). In Cox regression models, the low PAPi/low PAC group was independently associated with adverse outcomes compared with the other groups (hazard ratio (HR): 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28–10.40, p = 0.015 adjusted for age and sex; HR: 3.61, 95% CI: 1.27–10.26, p = 0.016 adjusted for natriuretic peptide levels; HR: 3.07, 95% CI: 1.07–8.81, p = 0.038 adjusted for the Meta-analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score).Conclusions Combined PAPi–PAC assessment identified distinct haemodynamic phenotypes with prognostic significance following TAVI. This approach offers a simple, physiologically grounded framework for postprocedural risk stratification and individualised management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ozaki et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis (n=77). Low pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) and low pulmonary arterial capacitance (PAC) vs. Other PAPi-PAC groups was evaluated on Composite of all-cause death or heart failure-related hospitalisation (HR 3.65, 95% CI 1.28-10.40, p=0.015). Low pulmonary artery pulsatility index and low pulmonary arterial capacitance were associated with increased risk of death or heart failure hospitalization after TAVI (HR 3.65; 95% CI 1.28-10.40).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: