Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal study examines household income effects on adolescent mental well-being, suggesting crucial interventions.
Objectives Using four waves of data from the China Family Panel Study, this study examined the impact of household income trajectories on two key dimensions of adolescent mental well‐being (i.e., depressive symptoms and happiness) and explored the mediating mechanisms. Background Substantial evidence links socioeconomic status (SES) to adolescent mental health, yet few studies have examined how longitudinal SES trajectories shape mental well‐being and the mechanisms underlying these relationships. Method Using group‐based trajectory modeling, we analyzed a nationally representative sample of 3,491 Chinese families with adolescents aged 10 to 19, identifying five distinct income trajectories. Results Adolescents from stable lower middle‐income and decreasing‐income groups demonstrated more depressive symptoms compared with their counterparts in the stable high‐income group. These associations were primarily mediated by maternal mental well‐being and family material investment pathways. Additionally, adolescents in the stable low‐income group exhibited lower happiness levels than the stable high‐income group, with maternal mental well‐being partly mediating this association. Conclusion Both stable lower income and downward income mobility are significant predictors of poorer adolescent mental health outcomes, mediated through distinct pathways such as family stress and family material investment. Implications Our results underscore the critical role of SES trajectories in shaping developmental contexts that influence adolescent mental well‐being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: