PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Cognitive Linguistics2 citationsOpen Access

Mechanisms at the core of the Chinese script invention

View Full Paper
LOLudovica OttavianoSFSilvia Ferrara

Key Points

  • The research investigates the cognitive mechanisms behind the invention of Chinese writing as seen in ancient inscriptions.
  • Analyzed oracle bone and bronze inscriptions from the Late Shang to Western Zhou periods.
  • Integrated palaeographic and cognitive perspectives.
  • Examined metaphorical and metonymic visual devices in script formation.
  • Identified the primacy of visual structures in Chinese script development.
  • Showed the pivotal role of visual metaphor and metonymy in script evolution.
  • Challenged traditional phonocentric models by emphasizing direct mapping from orthography to semantics.

Abstract

Abstract This article explores the cognitive foundations of Chinese writing by analyzing the earliest attestations on oracle bone and bronze inscriptions from the Late Shang (1250–1045 BCE) to the Western Zhou (1045–771 BCE) periods. Integrating palaeographic and cognitive perspectives, we show that metaphorical and metonymic devices of the visual type, through visual emphasis on key configurations (such as pars pro toto ), conceptual extension of meaning, and organization of iconic core components, were crucial in shaping and anchoring the visual and semiotic architecture of the script. These cognitive mechanisms reveal a primacy of the visual structure of the script, supported by neuroscientific evidence of direct orthography-to-semantics mapping, with phonology acting only as a secondary refining mechanism. These findings challenge traditional phonocentric models of writing evolution and illustrate an internal developmental trajectory grounded on visual metaphor and metonymy that confirms, at last, the independent invention of Chinese writing.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ottaviano et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434b4f1d9ada3c1fb3349https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2025-0041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper