Qualitative interviews explore changing gender and sexual dynamics in Delhi, suggesting implications for social norms.
Taboos differentially reinforce socially constructed gender and sexual hierarchies that affect the experiences of all people—women, men, queer, heterosexual, and transgender people. In Delhi, India, institutions of heteropatriarchy, buttressed by colonial history, reproduce and naturalize limits to the agency and economic autonomy of women and queer people. These intimate economics influence and are influenced by people making decisions regarding relationships and have broad repercussions in society. How do individuals and groups simultaneously question, remake, and enlarge gendered categories and experiences? Interviews with middle-class people are discussed in the context of scholarship that considers the social, political, and historical contexts of the region. Interview responses are triangulated with ethnographic participation in Delhi-based events that examine and confront aspects of heteropatriarchal regulation of people regarding categories of gender and sexual expression. Themes emerge regarding how people create and access knowledge, economic autonomy, relationships, and family formation. The conclusion discusses ways in which the erosion of taboos reveals changing roles and identities and how these changes affect the hierarchal gender binary, producing social tensions and paradoxes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emme Edmunds (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: