PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 20260 citations

Durability Performance of Fly Ash Geopolymer Mortar under Long-Term Sulfate Exposure

View Full Paper
SNSyahidah Fani NastitiFGFarhan Ahmad GivariAHAgil Fitri Handayani

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the durability of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar against long-term sulfate exposure.
  • Experimental evaluation of two mix designs with different activator ratios (1:2 and 1:2.5).
  • Mortars immersed in 5% sulfuric acid for 84 days.
  • Periodic testing of compressive strength, mass loss, and sulfate content.
  • GMAk1:2 mortar showed lower mass loss (maximum 6.53 g) compared to GMAk1:2.5 (up to 11.80 g).
  • GMAk1:2 mortar maintained better compressive strength, reducing from 44.80 MPa to 39.63 MPa.
  • GMAk1:2.5 exhibited a strength decrease from 35.96 MPa to 26.08 MPa.
  • Sulfate content in GMAk1:2 mortar remained stable, highlighting its resistance to sulfate ingress.

Abstract

The long-term durability of geopolymer mortar against sulfate attack is crucial for sustainable infrastructure, especially in aggressive environments. This study presents experimental findings on the performance of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars immersed in 5% sulfuric acid for 84 days. Two mix designs with different activator ratios (1:2 and 1:2.5) were evaluated through periodic testing of compressive strength, mass loss analysis, and sulfate content. The results showed that GMAk1 :2 mortar exhibited lower mass loss (maximum 6.53 g) and smaller reduction in compressive strength (from 44.80 Mpa to 39.63 Mpa) compared to GMAk1:2.5, which experienced a mass loss of up to 11.80 g and a strength decrease from 35.96 MPa to 26.08 MPa. The sulfate content in GMAk1:2 mortar remained relatively stable, indicating better resistance to sulfate ingress. These findings highlight that optimizing the activator ratio significantly enhances the sulfate resistance of geopolymer mortar, making it suitable for structural applications in chemically aggressive environments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nastiti et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434c0f1d9ada3c1fb33cahttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565211003/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper